The evaluation report states that the demand, how the faculty is determined by what products and services they deliver to service centers, is hampered by the directors in the business faculties in practice, different powers. The Executive Board believes that an undesirable situation because it leads to an inefficient operation. At present it is possible that an appointment with the managing director of products and services that provide service centers are not obvious by the dean takes over. By EMB, the officer appointed as managing director of the owner of the service centers, the College also gives preference to the term stakeholder. He will also have powers to hear in this role. This means that, in the opinion of the Board, on behalf of the faculty is competent to make agreements with the service centers. He binds the faculty to the agreement. Obviously, the managing director or the responsibility to its faculty to organize a process leading to the provision of services and products through the service centers where we really need for it in the faculty. The role of information manager can perhaps better be released, the process involves responsibility. For previous service centers means that the managing director of their conversation partner in the faculty. The Board sees a reason for exception: the content (educational) educational portfolio is the teaching faculty in the interlocutor. This may be advised by the program director. .